Curtis P. v. O’Malley (D.S.C. Feb. 5, 2025) - due process violation: scheduling then cancelling remand hearing without notice, plaintiff opposed remand and successfully sought remand for an award of benefits No objections were filed

No objections were filed

’s treating psychologist

2) The ALJ’s finding that Plaintiff can perform the exertional demands of light work is not supported by substantial evidence

RFC - required findings

Past relevant work – as generally performed

Curtis P. v. O’Malley (D.S.C. Feb. 5, 2025) - due process violation: scheduling then cancelling remand hearing without notice, plaintiff opposed remand and successfully sought remand for an award of benefits No objections were filedCurtis P. v. OMalley, Case No. 1: 24 3288 SVH (D. S. C. Feb. 5, 2025) (Decision by U. S. Magistrate Shiva V. Hodges, by consent) Briefs for purchase: Plaintiffs Brief, Response to Motion to Remand (seeking payment of benefits); Opinion remanding for a calculation of benefits Topics addressed: RFC lack of support for findings RFC assistive device Medical opinions supportability Medical opinions consistency Weight of VA disability finding Vocational